Polyurethane Metal Catalyst use in microcellular polyurethane shoe sole materials

Polyurethane Metal Catalysts in Microcellular Polyurethane Shoe Sole Materials: A Comprehensive Review

Abstract: Microcellular polyurethane (MPU) shoe soles are widely utilized due to their excellent properties such as lightweight nature, good abrasion resistance, and cushioning performance. The efficient production of MPU shoe soles relies heavily on the catalytic activity of various compounds, with metal catalysts playing a crucial role in controlling the reaction kinetics and influencing the final material properties. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the use of metal catalysts in MPU shoe sole formulation, focusing on their reaction mechanisms, influence on material properties, and specific product parameters. We examine the application of various metal catalysts, including tin, bismuth, zinc, and others, and discuss their advantages and limitations in the context of MPU shoe sole manufacturing. The review also explores recent advancements in catalyst technology and their potential impact on the performance and sustainability of MPU shoe soles.

Keywords: Microcellular Polyurethane, Shoe Sole, Metal Catalyst, Reaction Kinetics, Material Properties, Sustainability.

1. Introduction

Polyurethane (PU) is a versatile polymer extensively used in a wide range of applications, including adhesives, coatings, elastomers, and foams. Microcellular polyurethane (MPU) is a specific type of PU foam characterized by a fine, closed-cell structure, making it ideal for shoe sole applications. The microcellular structure contributes to the lightweight nature, excellent cushioning, and good abrasion resistance of MPU shoe soles, leading to enhanced comfort and durability.

The production of MPU involves the reaction between a polyol, an isocyanate, water (or other blowing agents), and various additives, including catalysts. Catalysts play a critical role in accelerating the urethane (reaction between isocyanate and polyol) and urea (reaction between isocyanate and water) reactions, controlling the foam morphology, and influencing the final material properties. Metal catalysts, particularly those based on tin, bismuth, and zinc, are commonly used in MPU shoe sole formulation due to their effectiveness and cost-efficiency.

This review aims to provide a detailed examination of the use of metal catalysts in MPU shoe sole materials. It covers the reaction mechanisms of these catalysts, their impact on the properties of MPU shoe soles, and a comparison of different catalyst types. The review also explores recent advancements in metal catalyst technology and their potential to improve the performance and sustainability of MPU shoe soles.

2. Polyurethane Chemistry and Microcellular Foam Formation

The formation of polyurethane involves the reaction between a polyol (a compound containing multiple hydroxyl groups) and an isocyanate (a compound containing one or more isocyanate groups, -NCO). The basic reaction is:

R-NCO + R'-OH → R-NH-COO-R'
(Isocyanate) + (Polyol) → (Urethane)

This reaction is exothermic and forms a urethane linkage. The properties of the resulting polyurethane are determined by the type of polyol and isocyanate used, as well as the ratio of the reactants.

For MPU foam production, a blowing agent is added to create the cellular structure. Water is a common blowing agent, reacting with the isocyanate to produce carbon dioxide (CO₂), which acts as the blowing gas:

R-NCO + H<sub>2</sub>O → R-NHCOOH → R-NH<sub>2</sub> + CO<sub>2</sub>
(Isocyanate) + (Water) → (Carbamic Acid) → (Amine) + (Carbon Dioxide)

The amine produced can then react with another isocyanate molecule to form a urea linkage:

R-NCO + R'-NH<sub>2</sub> → R-NH-CO-NH-R'
(Isocyanate) + (Amine) → (Urea)

The balance between the urethane and urea reactions is crucial for controlling the foam morphology. The urea reaction is generally faster than the urethane reaction, leading to a more rigid structure. Catalysts are used to control the relative rates of these reactions and to ensure that the expansion of the foam coincides with the gelation process, resulting in a stable and uniform microcellular structure.

3. Metal Catalysts: Types and Reaction Mechanisms

Metal catalysts are widely employed in polyurethane production due to their ability to accelerate both the urethane and urea reactions. They act by coordinating with the reactants, lowering the activation energy of the reaction and increasing the reaction rate. The choice of metal catalyst depends on the specific application and desired properties of the polyurethane material.

Here’s a breakdown of common metal catalysts used in MPU shoe sole production:

• 3.1 Tin Catalysts: Organotin compounds, such as dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL) and stannous octoate, are among the most widely used metal catalysts in polyurethane chemistry. They are highly effective in accelerating both the urethane and urea reactions.

  • Reaction Mechanism: Tin catalysts are believed to coordinate with both the isocyanate and the hydroxyl groups of the polyol, facilitating the nucleophilic attack of the hydroxyl group on the isocyanate carbon. The tin atom acts as a Lewis acid, accepting electron density from the carbonyl oxygen of the isocyanate, making the carbon atom more electrophilic and susceptible to attack.

  • Advantages: High catalytic activity, readily available, relatively low cost.

  • Disadvantages: Potential toxicity concerns related to organotin compounds. Environmental concerns due to the persistence of tin in the environment. Can cause discoloration of the final product.

• 3.2 Bismuth Catalysts: Bismuth carboxylates, such as bismuth neodecanoate, are gaining popularity as environmentally friendly alternatives to tin catalysts. They offer good catalytic activity with reduced toxicity.

  • Reaction Mechanism: Similar to tin catalysts, bismuth catalysts are believed to coordinate with both the isocyanate and the hydroxyl groups of the polyol. The bismuth atom acts as a Lewis acid, activating the isocyanate group and facilitating the reaction with the polyol.

  • Advantages: Lower toxicity compared to tin catalysts. Good catalytic activity. Reduced discoloration.

  • Disadvantages: Generally lower catalytic activity compared to DBTDL. Can be more expensive than tin catalysts.

• 3.3 Zinc Catalysts: Zinc carboxylates, such as zinc octoate, are also used as catalysts in polyurethane production. They are generally less active than tin catalysts but offer a good balance of activity and cost.

  • Reaction Mechanism: Zinc catalysts likely coordinate with the isocyanate and polyol in a similar manner to tin and bismuth catalysts. The zinc atom acts as a Lewis acid, facilitating the reaction between the two reactants.

  • Advantages: Relatively low cost. Good stability. Lower toxicity compared to tin catalysts.

  • Disadvantages: Lower catalytic activity compared to tin catalysts. May require higher loading levels.

• 3.4 Other Metal Catalysts: Other metal catalysts, such as those based on zirconium, titanium, and aluminum, have also been investigated for polyurethane production. However, they are less commonly used in MPU shoe sole applications compared to tin, bismuth, and zinc catalysts.

Table 1: Comparison of Common Metal Catalysts Used in MPU Shoe Sole Production

Catalyst Type	Chemical Formula (Example)	Catalytic Activity	Toxicity	Cost	Discoloration	Applications
Dibutyltin Dilaurate (DBTDL)	(C4H9)2Sn(OOC(CH2)10CH3)2	High	High	Moderate	Yes	General PU foam, coatings, elastomers, shoe soles
Bismuth Neodecanoate	Bi(OOC(CH3)2C7H15)3	Moderate	Low	High	No	General PU foam, coatings, elastomers, shoe soles
Zinc Octoate	Zn(OOC(CH2)6CH3)2	Low	Low	Low	No	General PU foam, coatings, elastomers

4. Influence of Metal Catalysts on MPU Shoe Sole Properties

The choice and concentration of metal catalysts significantly influence the properties of MPU shoe soles. The following properties are particularly affected:

• 4.1 Reaction Profile: The catalyst determines the rate and exotherm of the polyurethane reaction. A fast reaction leads to rapid foam rise and gelation, while a slower reaction allows for better control over the foam morphology.

  • Gel Time: The time it takes for the polyurethane mixture to reach a gel-like consistency. Metal catalysts shorten gel time.
  • Rise Time: The time it takes for the foam to reach its maximum height. Metal catalysts reduce rise time.

• 4.2 Foam Morphology: The catalyst influences the cell size, cell distribution, and cell openness of the MPU foam. A uniform and fine cell structure is desirable for optimal cushioning and abrasion resistance.

  • Cell Size: The average diameter of the cells in the foam. Metal catalysts can influence cell size by controlling the nucleation and growth of bubbles.
  • Cell Density: The number of cells per unit volume of the foam. Metal catalysts can affect cell density by influencing the rate of bubble formation.
  • Cell Openness: The percentage of cells that are interconnected. Metal catalysts can influence cell openness by affecting the stability of the cell walls.

• 4.3 Mechanical Properties: The catalyst affects the mechanical properties of the MPU shoe sole, such as tensile strength, elongation at break, and compression set.

  • Tensile Strength: The force required to break a sample of the material. Metal catalysts can influence tensile strength by affecting the crosslinking density of the polyurethane network.
  • Elongation at Break: The amount of elongation a sample can undergo before breaking. Metal catalysts can affect elongation at break by influencing the flexibility of the polyurethane chains.
  • Compression Set: The permanent deformation of a material after being subjected to a compressive load. Metal catalysts can influence compression set by affecting the elasticity of the polyurethane network.
  • Hardness: The resistance of the material to indentation. Metal catalysts can influence hardness by affecting the crosslinking density and rigidity of the polyurethane network.

• 4.4 Density: The density of the MPU shoe sole is influenced by the catalyst through its effect on the blowing reaction and foam expansion. Controlling the density is crucial for achieving the desired cushioning and weight characteristics.

• 4.5 Abrasion Resistance: The resistance of the material to wear and tear. Metal catalysts can influence abrasion resistance by affecting the hardness and crosslinking density of the polyurethane network.

Table 2: Influence of Catalyst Type on MPU Shoe Sole Properties

Catalyst Type	Gel Time	Rise Time	Cell Size	Tensile Strength	Elongation at Break	Compression Set	Density	Abrasion Resistance
DBTDL	Fast	Fast	Small	High	Low	Low	High	High
Bismuth	Moderate	Moderate	Medium	Moderate	Moderate	Moderate	Moderate	Moderate
Zinc	Slow	Slow	Large	Low	High	High	Low	Low

5. Recent Advancements in Metal Catalyst Technology

Recent research has focused on developing new metal catalysts that offer improved performance, reduced toxicity, and enhanced sustainability. Some of the key advancements include:

• 5.1 Encapsulated Metal Catalysts: Encapsulating metal catalysts in a polymeric matrix can improve their handling, dispersion, and long-term stability. Encapsulation can also reduce the release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from the catalyst.

• 5.2 Supported Metal Catalysts: Supporting metal catalysts on a solid support, such as silica or alumina, can increase their surface area and catalytic activity. Supported catalysts can also be easier to recover and reuse.

• 5.3 Metal-Free Catalysts: Metal-free catalysts, such as tertiary amine catalysts and organic acids, are being explored as alternatives to metal catalysts to address toxicity and environmental concerns. While they often have lower activity, they can be used in combination with metal catalysts to achieve a balance of performance and sustainability.

• 5.4 Nanomaterial-Based Catalysts: The use of metal nanoparticles as catalysts has shown promise in enhancing reaction rates and controlling foam morphology. The high surface area of nanoparticles leads to increased catalytic activity.

• 5.5 Combinations of Catalysts: Using a combination of different metal catalysts can provide synergistic effects, leading to improved control over the reaction kinetics and final material properties. For example, combining a tin catalyst with a bismuth catalyst can provide a balance of activity and reduced toxicity.

6. Formulation Considerations for Metal Catalysts in MPU Shoe Soles

Several factors must be considered when formulating MPU shoe soles with metal catalysts:

• 6.1 Catalyst Concentration: The optimal catalyst concentration depends on the specific catalyst, the polyol and isocyanate used, and the desired reaction rate. Too little catalyst will result in a slow reaction and poor foam formation, while too much catalyst can lead to a rapid and uncontrolled reaction, resulting in defects in the foam structure.

• 6.2 Catalyst Compatibility: The catalyst must be compatible with the other components of the formulation, including the polyol, isocyanate, blowing agent, and other additives. Incompatibility can lead to phase separation, poor dispersion, and reduced catalytic activity.

• 6.3 Storage Stability: The catalyst should be stable during storage to prevent degradation and loss of activity. Some metal catalysts are sensitive to moisture and oxygen and require special handling and storage conditions.

• 6.4 Processing Conditions: The processing conditions, such as temperature and mixing speed, can influence the activity of the catalyst and the properties of the resulting MPU shoe sole.

• 6.5 Environmental Regulations: Environmental regulations regarding the use of certain metal catalysts, particularly organotin compounds, are becoming increasingly stringent. Formulators must consider these regulations when selecting a catalyst.

7. Sustainability Considerations

The sustainability of MPU shoe soles is a growing concern. The use of metal catalysts can impact the sustainability of the product in several ways:

• 7.1 Toxicity: Some metal catalysts, particularly organotin compounds, are toxic and can pose health risks to workers and consumers. The use of less toxic alternatives, such as bismuth catalysts, can improve the sustainability of MPU shoe soles.

• 7.2 Environmental Impact: The production and disposal of metal catalysts can have a negative impact on the environment. The use of catalysts that are readily biodegradable or can be recovered and reused can reduce the environmental impact.

• 7.3 Resource Depletion: The extraction and processing of metals used in catalysts can contribute to resource depletion. The use of catalysts that are based on abundant and readily available metals can improve the sustainability of MPU shoe soles.

• 7.4 VOC Emissions: Some metal catalysts can release VOCs during the manufacturing process. The use of encapsulated or supported catalysts can reduce VOC emissions.

8. Conclusion

Metal catalysts play a crucial role in the production of microcellular polyurethane shoe soles. They influence the reaction kinetics, foam morphology, and final material properties of the MPU material. While tin catalysts have traditionally been the workhorse of the industry, concerns about their toxicity have led to increased interest in alternative catalysts based on bismuth and zinc. Recent advancements in catalyst technology, such as encapsulated and supported catalysts, offer the potential to improve the performance, reduce the toxicity, and enhance the sustainability of MPU shoe soles. Careful consideration of catalyst type, concentration, compatibility, storage stability, processing conditions, and environmental regulations is essential for formulating high-performance and sustainable MPU shoe soles. Future research should focus on developing novel catalysts that offer a balance of performance, cost-effectiveness, and environmental friendliness. The use of combinations of catalysts and the exploration of metal-free catalysts also hold promise for improving the sustainability of MPU shoe soles.

9. Future Research Directions

• Development of novel metal catalysts with improved activity and reduced toxicity.
• Investigation of synergistic effects of catalyst combinations.
• Exploration of metal-free catalysts as alternatives to metal catalysts.
• Development of sustainable methods for catalyst production and recovery.
• Optimization of MPU formulation and processing conditions for specific applications.
• Life cycle assessment of MPU shoe soles to evaluate their environmental impact.

10. References

(Note: The following are examples and should be replaced with actual cited works.)

• Oertel, G. (Ed.). (1993). Polyurethane Handbook. Hanser Publishers.
• Randall, D., & Lee, S. (2002). The Polyurethanes Book. John Wiley & Sons.
• Hepburn, C. (1991). Polyurethane Elastomers. Elsevier Science Publishers.
• Ashby, M. F., & Jones, D. R. H. (2012). Engineering Materials 1: An Introduction to Properties, Applications and Design. Butterworth-Heinemann.
• Saunders, J. H., & Frisch, K. C. (1962). Polyurethanes: Chemistry and Technology. Interscience Publishers.
• Szycher, M. (1999). Szycher’s Handbook of Polyurethanes. CRC Press.
• Prociak, A., Ryszkowska, J., & Uram, K. (2016). Polyurethane Foams. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• Klempner, D., & Sendijarevic, V. (2004). Polymeric Foams and Foam Technology. Hanser Publishers.
• Yu, X., et al. (2020). "Recent Advances in the Application of Catalysts in Polyurethane Foams." Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 137(40), 49221.
• Zhang, Y., et al. (2018). "Bismuth-Based Catalysts for Polyurethane Synthesis: A Review." Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 57(12), 4021-4035.

Sales Contact：sales@newtopchem.com