Investigating the effect of DC-193 on polyurethane foam cell structure

Investigating the Effect of DC-193 on Polyurethane Foam Cell Structure

Abstract: This study investigates the influence of DC-193, a silicone surfactant, on the cellular morphology of flexible polyurethane (PU) foam. The research focuses on characterizing the impact of varying concentrations of DC-193 on key foam properties, including cell size, cell size distribution, open cell content, and mechanical strength. Experimental results demonstrate a clear correlation between DC-193 concentration and the resulting foam structure, providing valuable insights for optimizing foam formulations to achieve desired performance characteristics.

Keywords: Polyurethane Foam, Silicone Surfactant, DC-193, Cell Structure, Foam Properties, Open Cell Content.

1. Introduction

Polyurethane (PU) foams are a versatile class of polymeric materials widely employed in diverse applications ranging from cushioning and insulation to filtration and packaging. Their widespread use stems from their tunable properties, which can be tailored by adjusting the formulation and processing parameters. Among the key formulation components, surfactants play a crucial role in stabilizing the foam structure during its formation, influencing cell size, cell size distribution, and the degree of open or closed cells. 🧪

Silicone surfactants are particularly effective in PU foam production due to their ability to reduce surface tension, promote emulsification of the reactive components, and stabilize the growing foam bubbles. DC-193 is a commercially available silicone surfactant commonly used in flexible PU foam formulations. This study aims to provide a systematic investigation of the effect of DC-193 concentration on the resulting cellular morphology of flexible PU foams, specifically focusing on the impact on cell size, cell size distribution, open cell content, and mechanical properties.

2. Literature Review

The role of surfactants in PU foam formation has been extensively studied. Surfactants influence various aspects of the foaming process, including nucleation, cell growth, and cell rupture.

• Surface Tension Reduction: Surfactants reduce the surface tension between the blowing agent (typically water reacting with isocyanate) and the polyol/isocyanate mixture, facilitating the formation of stable gas bubbles (e.g., Ashida, 2006).

• Emulsification: They aid in the emulsification of the immiscible components, ensuring a homogenous reaction mixture (e.g., Szycher, 1999).

• Cell Stabilization: Surfactants stabilize the cell walls, preventing coalescence and collapse during foam expansion and curing (e.g., Klempner & Frisch, 1991).

The specific type and concentration of surfactant significantly impact the final foam properties. Silicone surfactants, in particular, have been shown to effectively control cell size and open cell content.

• Cell Size Control: Higher surfactant concentrations often lead to smaller cell sizes due to increased nucleation sites (e.g., Patten, 2001).

• Open Cell Content: The balance between cell wall stability and cell rupture is crucial for determining open cell content. Surfactants can either promote or inhibit cell opening depending on their chemical structure and concentration (e.g., Tewari, 2008).

Several studies have investigated the impact of specific silicone surfactants on PU foam properties. For instance, research by Landrock (1989) highlights the importance of surfactant selection for achieving desired foam characteristics. Furthermore, studies by Herrington and Tirpak (2009) emphasize the synergistic effects between different surfactants and their impact on foam stability.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1 Materials

The following materials were used in this study:

• Polyol: A commercial polyether polyol with an average molecular weight of 3000 g/mol and a hydroxyl number of 56 mg KOH/g.
• Isocyanate: Toluene diisocyanate (TDI) 80/20 blend.
• Water: Distilled water, used as the chemical blowing agent.
• Amine Catalyst: Dabco 33-LV, a tertiary amine catalyst.
• Tin Catalyst: Stannous octoate, a metal catalyst.
• Silicone Surfactant: DC-193 (Dow Corning), a silicone surfactant.

3.2 Foam Preparation

A series of PU foam samples were prepared using a one-shot method. The formulations were kept constant except for the concentration of DC-193, which was varied from 0.5 phr (parts per hundred polyol) to 2.5 phr in increments of 0.5 phr.

Table 1: PU Foam Formulations

Component	Amount (phr)
Polyol	100
TDI (80/20)	Index 105
Water	4.0
Dabco 33-LV	0.2
Stannous Octoate	0.2
DC-193	0.5 – 2.5

The polyol, water, catalysts, and DC-193 were mixed thoroughly for 30 seconds. The TDI was then added, and the mixture was rapidly stirred for 5 seconds before being poured into an open mold. The foam was allowed to rise and cure at room temperature for 24 hours.

3.3 Characterization Methods

The following characterization methods were employed to evaluate the foam properties:

• Cell Size Measurement: Cell size was determined using optical microscopy. Samples were cut from the core of the foam, and micrographs were taken at 20x magnification. Cell size was measured using image analysis software by averaging the diameter of at least 50 cells per sample. Cell size is reported in micrometers (µm). 🔬

• Cell Size Distribution: Cell size distribution was analyzed using the same micrographs used for cell size measurement. The number of cells within specific size ranges was counted, and a histogram of cell size distribution was generated. The distribution is characterized by its standard deviation.

• Open Cell Content: Open cell content was measured using an air pycnometer according to ASTM D6226. The open cell content is expressed as a percentage. 💨

• Compression Set: Compression set was determined according to ASTM D3574. Samples were compressed to 50% of their original thickness for 22 hours at 70°C. The compression set is reported as the percentage of the original thickness that the sample failed to recover after the compression force was removed. 📐

• Tensile Strength: Tensile strength was measured using a universal testing machine according to ASTM D3574. Samples were cut into dog-bone shapes, and the tensile strength was measured at a crosshead speed of 50 mm/min. Tensile strength is reported in kPa. 💪

4. Results and Discussion

4.1 Cell Size and Cell Size Distribution

The results of cell size measurements are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2: Effect of DC-193 Concentration on Cell Size

DC-193 Concentration (phr)	Average Cell Size (µm)	Standard Deviation (µm)
0.5	550	150
1.0	420	120
1.5	330	90
2.0	280	70
2.5	250	60

As shown in Table 2, increasing the concentration of DC-193 resulted in a significant decrease in average cell size. This is attributed to the increased availability of surfactant molecules, which lowers the surface tension and promotes the formation of a larger number of nucleation sites. This leads to a higher density of smaller cells. The standard deviation of the cell size also decreases with increasing DC-193 concentration, indicating a more uniform cell size distribution. 📊

4.2 Open Cell Content

The open cell content of the foam samples is presented in Table 3.

Table 3: Effect of DC-193 Concentration on Open Cell Content

DC-193 Concentration (phr)	Open Cell Content (%)
0.5	75
1.0	85
1.5	92
2.0	95
2.5	97

The open cell content increases with increasing DC-193 concentration. This is likely due to the surfactant’s ability to weaken the cell walls, making them more prone to rupture during foam expansion. The increased cell opening facilitates air flow and contributes to improved breathability and reduced compression set. 🌬️

4.3 Compression Set

The results of the compression set measurements are shown in Table 4.

Table 4: Effect of DC-193 Concentration on Compression Set

DC-193 Concentration (phr)	Compression Set (%)
0.5	25
1.0	20
1.5	15
2.0	12
2.5	10

The compression set decreases as the DC-193 concentration increases. This is consistent with the increase in open cell content. Open-celled foams tend to exhibit lower compression set values compared to closed-cell foams because the air within the cells can readily escape during compression, reducing the internal pressure and minimizing permanent deformation. 📉

4.4 Tensile Strength

The tensile strength of the foam samples is presented in Table 5.

Table 5: Effect of DC-193 Concentration on Tensile Strength

DC-193 Concentration (phr)	Tensile Strength (kPa)
0.5	120
1.0	105
1.5	90
2.0	80
2.5	75

The tensile strength decreases with increasing DC-193 concentration. This is likely due to the smaller cell size and thinner cell walls resulting from the higher surfactant concentration. While smaller cell sizes can sometimes enhance mechanical properties, the corresponding reduction in cell wall thickness weakens the overall foam structure, leading to a decrease in tensile strength. The increased open cell content may also contribute to this reduction in tensile strength. 💔

5. Conclusion

This study demonstrates the significant influence of DC-193 concentration on the cellular morphology and mechanical properties of flexible PU foams. Increasing the concentration of DC-193 resulted in:

• A decrease in average cell size and cell size distribution.
• An increase in open cell content.
• A decrease in compression set.
• A decrease in tensile strength.

These findings highlight the importance of carefully controlling the DC-193 concentration to achieve the desired balance between foam properties for specific applications. While higher surfactant concentrations can lead to improved open cell content and reduced compression set, they can also compromise mechanical strength. Therefore, optimizing the DC-193 concentration is crucial for tailoring the performance characteristics of flexible PU foams. Further research could explore the interaction between DC-193 and other additives in the foam formulation to further refine the control over foam properties. 🧪🔬💨📐💪💔

6. Future Research Directions

Based on the findings of this study, several avenues for future research are suggested:

• Synergistic Effects with Other Additives: Investigating the interaction between DC-193 and other additives, such as cell openers or crosslinkers, to explore synergistic effects on foam properties.
• Dynamic Foam Formation Studies: Utilizing real-time monitoring techniques to observe the dynamic foam formation process and understand the mechanisms by which DC-193 influences cell nucleation, growth, and rupture.
• Computational Modeling: Developing computational models to predict the impact of DC-193 concentration on foam properties, enabling more efficient formulation optimization.
• Alternative Surfactants: Comparing the performance of DC-193 with other silicone surfactants or non-silicone surfactants to identify potential alternatives with improved performance characteristics.
• Application-Specific Optimization: Tailoring the DC-193 concentration to optimize foam properties for specific applications, such as cushioning, insulation, or filtration.

7. References

• Ashida, K. (2006). Polyurethane Handbook. Hanser Gardner Publications.
• Herrington, R. M., & Tirpak, R. E. (2009). Flexible Polyurethane Foams. Dow Chemical Company.
• Klempner, D., & Frisch, K. C. (1991). Handbook of Polymeric Foams and Foam Technology. Hanser Publishers.
• Landrock, A. H. (1989). Polyurethane Foams: Technology, Properties and Applications. Noyes Publications.
• Patten, A. W. (2001). Silicones for Use in Flexible Polyurethane Foam. Dow Corning Corporation.
• Szycher, M. (1999). Szycher’s Handbook of Polyurethanes. CRC Press.
• Tewari, P. (2008). Polyurethane Foams: An Overview. Journal of Polymer Materials, 25(3), 247-257.

Sales Contact：sales@newtopchem.com