A Reliable Choice for Preventing Melt Degradation During Common Extrusion and Molding Processes

When it comes to the world of polymer processing, melt degradation is a bit like that annoying friend who always shows up uninvited—unwelcome, but hard to get rid of. Whether you’re extruding plastic films, injection molding automotive parts, or blowing bottles for your favorite soft drink, melt degradation can quietly creep in and ruin your day. But fear not! There are reliable strategies—and more specifically, additives—that can help you fight back.

In this article, we’ll explore what melt degradation really means, why it’s such a pain, and most importantly, how you can prevent it using reliable methods during common extrusion and molding processes. We’ll also dive into some specific products, their parameters, and how they stack up against each other. Think of this as your survival guide to keeping your polymers happy, healthy, and performing at their best.

What Exactly Is Melt Degradation?

Let’s start with the basics: melt degradation refers to the chemical breakdown of polymer chains when exposed to high temperatures and shear stress during processing. This breakdown can lead to a range of undesirable effects:

• Loss of molecular weight, resulting in reduced mechanical strength
• Discoloration, especially noticeable in light-colored or transparent materials
• Brittleness or loss of flexibility
• Increased melt viscosity, making processing harder
• Odor generation, which is never fun (especially if you’re working near food packaging)

Polymers aren’t inherently stable under high heat and pressure—they’re kind of like us after a long day without coffee. So, without proper protection, things can go downhill fast.

The Usual Suspects: Causes of Melt Degradation

Before we jump into solutions, let’s take a look at the main culprits behind melt degradation:

Now that we know who’s behind the curtain, let’s talk about how to stop them.

Enter the Heroes: Stabilizers and Antioxidants

The key to preventing melt degradation lies in the use of stabilizers and antioxidants. These compounds work by interrupting the chain reaction of degradation, scavenging harmful radicals, and neutralizing residual catalysts.

There are several types of additives commonly used in polymer processing:

1. Primary Antioxidants (Hindered Phenolics)

These guys are the heavy hitters. They donate hydrogen atoms to free radicals, effectively stopping the degradation process in its tracks.

Common Examples: Irganox 1010, Irganox 1076
Pros: Excellent thermal stability, good long-term performance
Cons: May discolor slightly at very high temps

2. Secondary Antioxidants (Phosphites & Thioesters)

They’re like the backup singers—they don’t steal the spotlight, but they support the main act. These antioxidants decompose hydroperoxides before they form radicals.

Common Examples: Irgafos 168, Doverphos S-9228
Pros: Work synergistically with primary antioxidants, reduce color formation
Cons: Less effective on their own

3. Heat Stabilizers

Used mainly in PVC and other sensitive polymers, these additives neutralize acidic byproducts formed during degradation.

Common Examples: Calcium-zinc stabilizers, organotin compounds
Pros: Essential for PVC processing
Cons: Can be expensive; some raise environmental concerns

4. UV Stabilizers

Though more relevant for post-processing exposure, UV stabilizers can still play a role in protecting polymers during outdoor applications.

Common Examples: Tinuvin 770, Chimassorb 944
Pros: Prevent photooxidation
Cons: Not always necessary during melt processing

Choosing the Right Additive: It’s All About Compatibility

Just like you wouldn’t pair sushi with ketchup, not all additives work well together—or with every polymer. Here’s a handy compatibility table:

Choosing the right combination isn’t just about chemistry—it’s also about economics, regulatory compliance, and end-use requirements. For instance, food-grade packaging requires non-toxic additives, while automotive components might prioritize long-term thermal endurance.

Real-World Performance: Case Studies and Data

Let’s get down to brass tacks. How do these additives actually perform in real-world scenarios? Let’s take a few examples.

Case Study 1: Polypropylene Film Extrusion

A major film manufacturer noticed increasing brittleness and discoloration in their BOPP films. After analysis, they found significant molecular weight loss due to oxidation during processing.

Solution: They switched from a basic antioxidant package to a blend of Irganox 1076 and Irgafos 168 at a total loading of 0.3%.

Results:

• Melt flow index remained stable over multiple reprocessing cycles
• Color change reduced from Δb = 5.2 to Δb = 1.1
• Tensile strength improved by 12%

Case Study 2: PVC Pipe Extrusion

A PVC pipe producer was experiencing premature failure in pipes installed underground. Root cause analysis pointed to oxidative degradation caused by residual catalysts.

Solution: Introduced a calcium-zinc stabilizer system along with an epoxy-based co-stabilizer.

Results:

• Service life extended from 25 to over 50 years (as per accelerated aging tests)
• Reduced chlorine gas emissions during processing
• Compliance with REACH regulations ensured

Product Comparison Table: Leading Antioxidant Packages

Here’s a side-by-side comparison of some popular antioxidant systems used in industrial settings:

💡 Tip: Using a combination of primary and secondary antioxidants often yields better results than relying on a single additive.

Dosage Matters: Don’t Overdo It (Or Underdo It Either)

One of the most common mistakes in polymer processing is either under-dosing or over-dosing additives. Both can have negative consequences:

• Under-dosing: Inadequate protection leads to degradation
• Over-dosing: Increased costs, potential blooming or migration, and sometimes even counterproductive effects

As a general rule of thumb:

• For commodity polymers like PE and PP, typical antioxidant loadings range from 0.1% to 0.5%
• For engineering resins or recycled materials, higher dosages (up to 1%) may be required
• PVC stabilizers typically require 1% to 3% depending on formulation

Always conduct small-scale trials before full production runs.

Processing Conditions: Tailoring Your Approach

Melt degradation doesn’t care whether you’re running a blown film line or an injection mold—it will strike wherever the conditions allow. However, different processes expose the polymer to varying degrees of heat and shear.

Here’s a quick overview of typical processing conditions and recommended stabilization approaches:

🧪 Pro tip: If you’re reprocessing scrap or recycling materials, consider boosting antioxidant levels. Recycled polymers are often more degraded to begin with.

Regulatory and Environmental Considerations

With increasing global awareness around sustainability and chemical safety, it’s important to ensure that your chosen stabilizers meet regulatory standards.

Some key points to keep in mind:

• REACH Regulation (EU): Requires registration, evaluation, authorization, and restriction of chemicals.
• FDA Compliance: Necessary for food contact applications.
• RoHS Directive: Restricts hazardous substances like lead and cadmium—particularly relevant for PVC stabilizers.
• Biodegradability and Toxicity: Especially important for packaging and disposable items.

For example, many manufacturers are moving away from lead-based stabilizers in favor of calcium-zinc systems due to environmental and health concerns.

Future Trends: Greener and Smarter Stabilization

The polymer industry is evolving, and so are stabilization technologies. Here are some emerging trends:

• Bio-based antioxidants: Derived from natural sources like rosemary extract or tocopherols. While not yet mainstream, they offer promising eco-friendly alternatives.
• Nano-stabilizers: Nanoparticles like nano-clays or carbon dots are being explored for enhanced radical scavenging properties.
• Smart stabilizers: Responsive additives that activate only under extreme conditions, potentially extending shelf life and reducing waste.

While traditional synthetic antioxidants still dominate the market, expect to see more innovation in green chemistry and targeted delivery systems in the coming years.

Final Thoughts: Protecting Your Polymer Investment

Melt degradation is one of those silent threats that can quietly eat away at product quality, process efficiency, and ultimately, profitability. But with the right choice of stabilizers and antioxidants, you can protect your polymer investment and ensure consistent output across batches and machines.

Remember:

• Know your polymer and its vulnerabilities
• Match additives to both material and process
• Test before scaling up
• Stay compliant and future-ready

And above all—don’t wait until you see discoloration or brittleness to act. Prevention is always cheaper than cure.

References

1. Gugumus, F. (2000). Antioxidants in polyolefins. Journal of Vinyl and Additive Technology, 6(2), 122–132.
2. Zweifel, H. (Ed.). (2009). Plastics Additives Handbook (6th ed.). Hanser Publishers.
3. Ranby, B., & Rabek, J. F. (1975). Photodegradation, Photo-oxidation and Photostabilization of Polymers. Wiley.
4. Pospíšil, J., & Nešpůrek, S. (2005). Prevention of polymer photodegradation. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 90(2), 237–254.
5. Baerlocher, C., & Vögtle, F. (2003). Stabilizers for Plastics. Springer.
6. ASTM D3835 – Standard Test Method for Determination of Rheological Properties of Thermoplastic Materials Using a Capillary Rheometer.
7. ISO 300:2017 – Rubber compounding ingredients – Carbon black – Determination of oil absorption number.
8. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). (2022). REACH Regulation Overview.
9. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2021). Substances Added to Food (formerly EAFUS).
10. Rastogi, N. K., & Sammon, C. (2008). Thermal degradation studies of polyolefins using chemiluminescence. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 93(11), 1978–1985.

Until next time, stay stabilized, my friends. 🔥

Sales Contact：sales@newtopchem.com