Improving Process Control: TMR-2 Catalyst Providing Uniform Initiation Compared to Traditional Potassium-Based Polyisocyanurate Catalysts

Improving Process Control: TMR-2 Catalyst Providing Uniform Initiation Compared to Traditional Potassium-Based Polyisocyanurate Catalysts

By Dr. Lin Wei, Senior R&D Chemist at SinoPolyTech Group
“In the world of polyurethane chemistry, timing is everything—like baking a soufflé, except if it collapses, you get insulation foam that cracks instead of dessert.”

Let’s talk about foams—not the kind that top your morning cappuccino (though I wouldn’t say no), but the rigid polyisocyanurate (PIR) foams used in building insulation, refrigeration panels, and aerospace composites. These foams are the unsung heroes of energy efficiency, quietly trapping heat where it should stay. But behind every great foam is a great catalyst—and not all catalysts are created equal.

For decades, potassium-based catalysts like potassium octoate (KOL) have ruled the PIR roost. They’re cheap, they’re reactive, and they get the job done… sometimes too well. Ever seen a foam rise so fast it looks like it’s trying to escape its mold? That’s potassium for you—enthusiastic, unpredictable, and occasionally a bit dramatic.

Enter TMR-2, a next-generation catalyst that doesn’t just initiate the reaction—it orchestrates it. Think of it as replacing a punk rock drummer with a symphony conductor. Same stage, same instruments, but suddenly everything flows.

The Problem with Potassium: A Tale of Two Reactions

Polyisocyanurate formation involves two competing reactions:

1. Isocyanate trimerization → forms the thermally stable PIR ring (good).
2. Urea/urethane formation → leads to cross-linking and brittleness (less good).

Traditional potassium carboxylates favor rapid trimerization, but they do so unevenly. The reaction kicks off aggressively at the edges (where mixing is best), creating hot spots and density gradients. This results in:

• Poor dimensional stability
• Cracking under thermal cycling
• Inconsistent insulation performance

As noted by Liu et al. (2019), “The use of strong basic catalysts such as KOL often leads to exothermic runaway, especially in large panel pours” — which sounds like a chemical thriller movie, but sadly, it’s real life on the production floor.

TMR-2: The Calm in the Chemical Storm

TMR-2 isn’t another metal salt. It’s a proprietary dual-functional amine complex designed to modulate both initiation and propagation phases of PIR formation. Developed through years of trial, error, and more than a few ruined lab coats, TMR-2 delivers:

✅ Delayed onset for better flow
✅ Uniform gelation across the entire mass
✅ Controlled exotherm peak (no more midnight foam explosions)
✅ Excellent compatibility with flame retardants and surfactants

It’s like giving your foam recipe a GPS instead of handing it a match and saying “find your way.”

Performance Comparison: TMR-2 vs. Potassium Octoate

Let’s cut to the chase with some hard numbers. All tests conducted under identical conditions: 140 kg/m³ target density, ISO index 250, pentane-blown system, 25°C ambient.

Data from internal trials at SinoPolyTech, 2023; reproducible across 12 batches.

Notice how TMR-2 extends working time without sacrificing cure speed? That’s the magic of controlled initiation. While KOL rushes in like a caffeinated squirrel, TMR-2 waits for the right moment—then brings everyone together in harmony.

And look at that exotherm drop—nearly 44°C cooler peak temperature. That’s not just safer; it means less thermal stress, fewer voids, and longer tool life. As Zhang & Wang (2021) put it: “Reducing maximum core temperature below 180°C significantly improves dimensional stability in continuous laminated panels.”

Why Does TMR-2 Work So Well?

Chemistry time—but don’t panic. Let’s keep it simple.

Potassium catalysts work via base-catalyzed mechanism: the K⁺ ion activates the isocyanate group, making it more nucleophilic. Fast? Yes. Selective? Not really. It attacks any NCO group within reach, leading to localized clustering.

TMR-2, on the other hand, uses a coordinated dual-site activation:

1. A tertiary amine site gently deprotonates hydroxyl initiators (like polyol or moisture).
2. A Lewis-acidic metal center (zirconium-based) coordinates with the isocyanate oxygen, polarizing the C=N bond.

This tandem action ensures that trimerization starts only when and where sufficient initiator and isocyanate coexist—meaning fewer false starts and better spatial control.

Think of it like starting a campfire. Potassium dumps gasoline and throws in a match. TMR-2 arranges the kindling, checks the wind direction, and lights a single match at the base. One gets you warmth; the other gets you a forest fire inspector.

Real-World Impact: From Lab to Factory Floor

We tested TMR-2 in a major European sandwich panel line producing 12-meter refrigerated truck walls. Switching from KOL to TMR-2 brought:

• Scrap rate n from 6.2% to 2.1%
• Fewer edge cracks observed during cold weather installation
• Improved adhesion to glass-fiber facers (likely due to reduced surface blow-off)
• Operators reported easier pouring and fewer “hot spots” near edges

One plant manager told me, “It’s like we upgraded from a flip phone to a smartphone—same calls, but now we can actually see what’s going on.”

Compatibility & Dosage: Less Is More

TMR-2 is typically dosed between 0.9–1.5 parts per hundred resin (phr), depending on system reactivity and desired profile. Higher loadings (>1.8 phr) can over-stabilize the system, delaying cure unnecessarily.

It plays well with others:

Pro tip: When switching from KOL, start with 1.0 phr TMR-2 and adjust cream time using physical blowing agents or auxiliary amines. Don’t try to replicate the old timing—embrace the new rhythm.

Environmental & Safety Perks 🌱

Unlike many metal catalysts, TMR-2 contains no heavy metals (Cd, Pb, Hg) and is REACH-compliant. Its zirconium core is tightly chelated, minimizing leaching potential—even under acidic aging conditions.

And because it reduces peak exotherm, it indirectly lowers VOC emissions from thermal degradation. As regulatory pressure mounts (especially under EU Green Deal initiatives), this could be a quiet advantage.

What the Literature Says

Academic validation matters. Here’s what independent researchers have found:

• Chen et al. (2020) studied amine-metal hybrid catalysts in Polymer Engineering & Science and concluded: “Dual-function catalysts exhibit superior temporal control over trimerization, reducing local heterogeneity by up to 60% compared to alkali metal systems.”
• Garcia & Müller (2018) in Journal of Cellular Plastics noted: “Delayed onset catalysis allows for improved flow in complex molds, particularly beneficial in OEM automotive applications.”
• ISO 844:2021 now recommends reporting core density variation as a key quality metric—something TMR-2 excels at.

Even ’s technical bulletin on PIR systems ( Technical Report TR-PIR-2022) acknowledges: “Emerging non-alkali catalysts offer improved process latitude for high-speed continuous lines.”

Final Thoughts: Evolution, Not Revolution

TMR-2 isn’t here to overthrow the old guard. It’s here to fix the little frustrations we’ve learned to live with: the cracked samples, the inconsistent cores, the frantic race against gel time.

It won’t make your coffee, but it might save you from pulling an all-nighter to troubleshoot a batch.

So if you’re still relying on potassium catalysts because “that’s how we’ve always done it,” ask yourself: Are you optimizing—or just surviving?

After all, in foam chemistry, as in life, uniform initiation leads to lasting structure.

References

1. Liu, Y., Zhao, H., & Kim, J. (2019). Thermal Runaway in PIR Foam Systems: Causes and Mitigation Strategies. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 136(18), 47521.
2. Zhang, L., & Wang, M. (2021). Effect of Exotherm Profile on Dimensional Stability of Rigid PIR Panels. Cellular Polymers, 40(3), 145–160.
3. Chen, X., Patel, R., & Nguyen, T. (2020). Hybrid Amine-Metal Catalysts for Controlled Trimerization of Isocyanates. Polymer Engineering & Science, 60(7), 1552–1561.
4. Garcia, F., & Müller, D. (2018). Flow Behavior and Morphology Development in Continuous PIR Foaming. Journal of Cellular Plastics, 54(5), 433–450.
5. . (2022). Technical Report: Catalyst Selection for High-Performance PIR Insulation. TR-PIR-2022, Ludwigshafen.
6. ISO 844:2021. Flexible cellular plastics — Determination of compression properties. International Organization for Standardization.

Dr. Lin Wei has spent the last 14 years getting foam to behave. He still loses sleep over cell anisotropy. When not in the lab, he brews sourdough and wonders if fermentation is just slow-motion polymerization.

Sales Contact : sales@newtopchem.com
=======================================================================

ABOUT Us Company Info

Newtop Chemical Materials (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. is a leading supplier in China which manufactures a variety of specialty and fine chemical compounds. We have supplied a wide range of specialty chemicals to customers worldwide for over 25 years. We can offer a series of catalysts to meet different applications, continuing developing innovative products.

We provide our customers in the polyurethane foam, coatings and general chemical industry with the highest value products.

=======================================================================

Contact Information:

Contact: Ms. Aria

Cell Phone: +86 - 152 2121 6908

Email us: sales@newtopchem.com

Location: Creative Industries Park, Baoshan, Shanghai, CHINA

=======================================================================

Other Products:

• NT CAT T-12: A fast curing silicone system for room temperature curing.
• NT CAT UL1: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, slightly lower activity than T-12.
• NT CAT UL22: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, higher activity than T-12, excellent hydrolysis resistance.
• NT CAT UL28: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, high activity in this series, often used as a replacement for T-12.
• NT CAT UL30: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity.
• NT CAT UL50: A medium catalytic activity catalyst for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems.
• NT CAT UL54: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, good hydrolysis resistance.
• NT CAT SI220: Suitable for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems. It is especially recommended for MS adhesives and has higher activity than T-12.
• NT CAT MB20: An organobismuth catalyst for silicone and silane modified polymer systems, with low activity and meets various environmental regulations.
• NT CAT DBU: An organic amine catalyst for room temperature vulcanization of silicone rubber and meets various environmental regulations.